Map of life expectancy at birth from Global Education Project.

Tuesday, October 08, 2019

Kurds Away

As my 2 1/2 long time readers know, for many years I maintained a blog called Today in Iraq and Afghanistan (originally Today in Iraq). During the height of U.S. involvement in Iraq we had thousands of visitors every day, and we were listed in the blogroll at Eschaton and other prominent sites. But Americans lost interest in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and even the fight against the Islamic State didn't garner much attention. I finally stopped blogging there a few months ago when the situation in both countries had turned into stagnation and the daily routine of generally low-level violence just didn't seem worth documenting.

Anyway, the result is that I know quite a lot about the situation that, rather astonishingly, has finally gotten some congressional Republicans to speak against their Dear Leader. It's more complicated than I can fully explain in this space, but I'll give the basics. The Kurds are an ethnic group that got largely screwed when the European powers carved up the Ottoman Empire after World War I. They wound up divided among Iraq, Syria, Iran and Turkey. The history of the Kurds in Iraq is very complicated but the upshot is that over the years they achieved a degree of self-rule but during the Iran-Iraq war Saddam Hussein adopted highly repressive policies toward Iraqi Kurdistan and perpetrated the notorious Anfal genocide. Following the fall of Saddam, the Kurds gained an autonomous regional government (the KRG) in federation with Iraq.

An militant faction called the PKK (which stands for Kurdistan workers party but that's irrelevant) seeking secession of Kurdish lands in Turkey took refuge in the mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan. Eventually, the KRG came to a tacit agreement with Turkey that it would not protect the PKK in exchange for Turkish acceptance of the KRG and trade relations. Meanwhile, in Syria, the Kurds call their territory Rojava, and they were able to attain effective autonomy in the Syrian civil war. Turkish leader Erdogan sees the Rojavan party, called the YPG or people's protection forces, as allied with the PKK and calls them terrorists. I don't know that there is any truth to this, they seem mostly interested in autonomy within Syria, but in any case Erdogan doesn't like the idea of a continuous strip of Kurdish self-rule along his southern border. (I know this is getting tiresome.)

Anyway, the Islamic state arose, first in the context of the Iraqi civil war. This was a disaster for which the U.S. is largely culpable, but  that's for another day. As Baghdad regained control of the lands to its north and west, the IS metastasized to Syria where it gained substantial territory, and then invaded the Mosul region of northwest Iraq, on the border of Iraqi Kurdistan. Rather than repeating the mistake of trying to seize territory in the region with its own forces, the U.S. chose to combat IS by providing support to Kurdish fighters, and tacitly cooperating with Iranian-backed militias in both Iraq and Syria. The YPG is the main component of the Syrian Democratic Forces, which defeated IS in Syria with the help of U.S. arms and air support. They are also responsible for prison camps where thousands of captured IS fighters and family members are now held.

Okay then. Erdogan has been threatening for a while to invade northern Syria, on the pretext that he wants to create a "safe zone" into which he can repatriate Syrian refugees who are currently in Turkey. He probably does want to do that, although there is no infrastructure there to receive them and he'd just be dumping them into the desert. But his more important motive is to push the YPG away from the Turkish border. There are a thousand or so U.S. troops there essentially as a tripwire, to discourage Erdogan from invading. In a phone call two days ago, the occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW agreed to remove those troops and allow Erdogan to invade. Here is an explanation of the situation from a Kurdish channel which also discusses the reaction of the leader of the KRG. The bottom line is that this will push the YPG into the arms of Bashar al-Assad and Russia, since they will have no other protector.

The Resident has since claimed that he won't tolerate a Turkish invasion after all, after getting an earful from Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham -- apparently that took him by surprise. But with the U.S. troops gone, there won't be much he can do about it. Meanwhile, of course, the YPG will have to abandon the IS prison camps and who knows what will happen then.

As you know I am generally highly resistant to U.S. military involvement abroad, but I fully recognized the necessity of destroying IS and I also fully appreciate the debt we owe to the Kurds of Rojava. Not saying I want U.S. troops there forever but we are obliged to work out a deal. Just turning tail and leaving is a bad look from all perspectives.

13 comments:

Eddie Pleasure said...

I started following your blog "Today in Afghanistan" a few years ago (thank you!) when a family member was deployed there. That same family member is now in Kuwait.
How can members of the military respect the Commander in Chief when he pulls crazy stunts like this, against the advice of the military experts? I have to admit that I am opposed to the U.S. military being in the Middle East in an Imperialist role, but to pull out the rug from underneath the men and women in harms way is evil.

Cervantes said...

And thank you for reading. We got a lot of positive feedback from families of people who were deployed, but some negative from people who thought that since we opposed the war in the first place, we weren't "supporting the troops." Quite the opposite as you understood.

Yeah, this situation is forcing people to reconsider their kneejerk reactions. What should have been happening is diplomatic work to get an agreement between Turkey and the YPG, then the troops could have left in an orderly way. But that wasn't happening because the State Department is dysfunctional.

Don Quixote said...

And, I think, isn't this decision basically yet one more smoking gun that every decision Shitler makes is dictated to him by Putin, and that he is literally Putin's bitch, flunky, mascot, puppet?

Don Quixote said...

PS--Yes, I'm saying it straight out: Putin has the "pee pee tape" and other blackmail on Shitler, and all of Shitler's actions are servile actions for his master to keep his own ass out of jail. I fully expect Shitler to abscond to Russia once caught.

Woody Peckerwood said...

So, how many troops did Trump pull out? No one seems to be reporting a number.

Cervantes said...

Actually zero. He didn't remove any troops from Syria, he just moved some special ops forces out of Erdogan's way. It was apparently a small number.

Woody Peckerwood said...


It appears to me that Trump had a phone call with Erdogan and Erdogan told him "We're moving in so if you want to get these guys out of the way, now's your chance..."

The media has characterized it as some massive troop movement that's ALLOWED Erdogan to come in and mop up the Kurds.

Cervantes said...

Well I very much doubt that it went that way. The original word from the WH was that he said fine, come on in. The troops were there as a trip wire -- Erdogan would not have invaded if they were still there. As I say, there had been negotiations going on about a buffer zone but it ended this way instead.

Cervantes said...

Lindsey Graham isn't exactly a member of the Fake News corporate media that's conspiring with the Deep State to commit regicide. Here's what he had to say:

“This impulsive decision by the president has undone all the gains we’ve made — thrown the region into further chaos,” Graham told the cast of “Fox & Friends” during his appearance on Monday. “Iran is licking their chops. And if I’m an ISIS fighter, I’ve got a second lease on life. So to those who think ISIS has been defeated, you will soon see.”

Co-host Brian Kilmeade also rebuked Trump on his favorite morning show.

“The reason why our casualties were so low is because the Kurds did all the fighting,” Kilmeade said. “Now we’re saying, ‘OK, Turks, go wipe them out or force them out.’ What kind of message is that to the next ally that wants to side with us?”

Woody Peckerwood said...


Yeah...reminds me when Obama pulled troops out of Iraq and allowed ISIS to grow. We lost all of the hard fought gains made.

I don't think either was a good idea, but I'm not the Commander-In-Chief. Obama was then and Trump is now.



Cervantes said...

Well, to set the record straight, IS actually first grew in Syria, then invaded northwest Iraq. And the Iraqis kicked the U.S. troops out, Obama didn't really have a choice. In any case, they're remaining in Iraq at that time would have done nothing to stem the growth of IS. Again, that happened in Syria.

Don Quixote said...

No one has responded--wondering if anyone would like to. Does it not seem that everything that Shitler does abroad is geared toward appeasing his master, Putin? Are not all his actions seemingly intended to push Russia's agenda (save his salutary bombing in Syria early in his presidency)?

After all, Shitler just says, "I believe Putin."

It seems to me he doesn't but rather that he is hostage to Putin.

Cervantes said...

Many people speculate about this.