Map of life expectancy at birth from Global Education Project.

Monday, November 22, 2004

Basic Assumptions Examined, Part I: Medicine and the Mythology of the Market

In a post coming soon, we'll examine the medical paradigm of health vs. the public health paradigm. But let's start with economics.

Some people say (as they put it on Fox News) that the problem with health care in the U.S. is that we don't allow the Free Market(tm) to work its magic. If government would just get itself off the back of the medical industry, the Free Market(tm) would control costs and allocate resources efficiently.

The idea that the so-called Free Market(tm) can do this depends on several assumptions which are seldom true in any context, but are particularly far from true in the case of medical services. These include (and this is just a telegraphic discussion):

No externalities: All of the costs and benefits to society of the transactions are captured in the exchange between buyers and sellers. Obviously not true in the case of medicine: medical care stops infectious diseases from spreading, society loses the productivity of sick people and their dependents lose support, it's unpleasant to watch people dying on the sidewalk, etc.

Perfect information: Sellers and particularly buyers have all the info they need to purchase in their best interest. But in medicine, what you are buying is expertise. You don't know what's wrong with you or what to do about it, that's why you go to the doctor. As consumers, we have little or no ability to compare the quality of various providers, even if we could shop based on price. We have to depend on licensing requirements to give us at least some assurance that our providers are competent.

Consumers create demand: Not in medicine: the doctor tells us what we need. In medicine, once we make the initial decision to go through the door, demand is largely induced by providers. Okay, not in special cases like some cosmetic surgery or sales of Viagra, but generally. Think about the consequences of that, absent some sort of non-market intervention.

Willing sellers, willing buyers: This concept is philosophically tricky -- in some sense, everything we do is a result of free will. Even if somebody's holding a gun to your head, you could choose the alternative of being shot. But common sense tells us that medical services are often necessities -- we'll die or suffer horribly if we don't get them. And we might have to watch our friends, neighbors and loved ones suffer or die unnecessarily. Anyway, we could go into the ER unconscious or demented, unable to make decisions for ourselves at all!

Justice: Actually, the theory of the Free Market (tm) doesn't say anything about justice -- the economists' definition of "efficiency" has nothing to do with what is good or right, although they usually forget that. But regardless of what we do or do not do to keep ourselves healthy, a lot of illness is not our own fault. People consume medical services not out of choice, but because they've been hit by a bus or poisoned by pollution or infected with HIV by their philandering husband, or for whatever reason, and we can't predict when, where or how much medical services we will need.

And that's why we universally think it proper, just and reasonable that medical services be paid for by insurance -- that the financial burden be shared so we can all get what we need, when we need, for the sake of ourselves, each other, and the public health. If people don't agree, let's hear why!

There are additional basic assumptions of market theory that are violated in the case of medical services, but that's enough for now. People may wish to add more in comments, or discuss these further.

Next up: How insurance works, and some of the oddities of insurance markets.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Testing 123

Anonymous said...

One of the big obstacles to universal health coverage is the notion "we can't afford it." People reading this blog probably understand that better health achieved through preventive care is cheaper in the long run than lost productivity and expensive acute care, but what the public at large sees, and what politicians see, is the Medicare/Medicaid funding mess; and they imagine universal coverage as a similar but much bigger funding mess. So let's consider how to clean up the funding mess we have, as a way of demonstrating we can handle a bigger funding challenge.

Our current funding problem is not just the amount of money required, but where it comes from: a payroll tax. Every worker in America is reminded every pay period that his health costs largely depend not on his health, but on his earnings. The more you work, the more you pay. No wonder they're not enthused about a bigger system. Employers also see health equated with costs and paperwork; no wonder they're also not enthused.

How about this: Instead of funding health by taxing Good Things (work, job creation), let's fund health by taxing Bad Things -- things that make us sick. Let's do away with the payroll tax for Medicare, and fund Medicare by taxing stuff such as the following:

Cigarettes (easy target).
Alcohol (1 penny per ounce = about a penny on each can of beer).
Trans fatty acids.
Saturated fats.
Cholesterol.
Sugar.
Industrial pollutants.
Cars and trucks (tax at sale and at annual registration; tax should vary based on amount of pollutants emitted and crash safety ratings for occupants of taxed vehicle, occupants of other vehicles it might crash into, and pedestrians).

More production of Bad Things = more revenue to treat the illnesses and injuries they cause. Less production of Bad Things = healthier population = less revenue needed.

Extending the same logic, we could offer an annual tax credit (or hell, just a yearly wad of cash) to every American who can pass an age-and-sex-calibrated fitness test.

Michel Phillips
michelp@mindspring.com

viagra said...

Interesting and I will be able to read your next post because I am an economist who loves discuss this kind of issues and you know what... I think you're one of the best blogger in the whole blogsphere and it'll be nice if you can add some sources and links to read something else about the health problem. 23jj

ремонт кухни said...

The dude is absolutely right, and there is no question.

Buy Valium Online said...

Valium, the two most traditionally prescribed subordinate tranquilizers are thought to be of high-minded help as one begins falling pursue to panic attacks and buy generic valium no prescription. They have turned out to be the jolly first two medicines that may terminate to your health pains provider mind if you originate speaking more killing thoughts, emotions of being singular and when anxiousness bothers you unnecessarily. You may do to an end your anxiousness and dent from attaining a life-threatening progressive stage in anyway a lest you are appointed whichever of these benzodiazepines at preferred moment in time, buy cheap valium online. There isn't a inquiry on the extraordinary success that and Valium procure achieved in a short time span.

muebles murcia said...

Wow, there is a great deal of useful information in this post!

sports handicapping software said...

thanks for sharing that information really instruct

Anonymous said...


Prix Viagra France
Viagra Prix France

Anonymous said...


atlantis casino reno nv
manual for samsung blackjack
lil lucu slot
gambling slots horse harness indian internet
download roulette
restaurants at mcphillips street casino
casino directory
casino morengo
casino gambling online online slot
gambling internet indian slots racing casino
blackjack inside
best online casino gambling
future casinos in kansas
best slots casinos
blackjack pactice game
las vegas hotels casino
free pc slot game
vesper cocktail casino royale movie
tropacana casino in atlantic city
camp blackjack