[T]he fidelity of Trump’s base remains astounding. He has made so many unforced errors because of his lack of understanding and low problem-solving intelligence, his vast ignorance, his enormous, never-ending dishonesty which seems as reflexive as his breathing, his explosive hostility, his uncontrollable vanity, his despicable demeaning of women, his squalid vulgarity, the stupidity of his stereotypes, the shabbiness of his thinking, the buffoonery of his parading, his attacks on the institutions he needs most to safeguard the country, his incredibly poor judgment about the character of those whom he has brought into his administration, his equally mind-numbing lack of judgment about foreign leaders, friend and foe, and his willingness to inflame Americans’ disagreements and turn them into conflagrations which make us that deeply divided house which the Gospels and Abraham Lincoln warned against—how can his supporters have stood so solidly behind him? You’d think they’d be having some second thoughts at least. . . .
Compared to most people, studies have shown that authoritarian followers get their beliefs and opinions from the authorities in their lives, and hardly at all by making up their own minds. They memorize rather than reason. . . .When your beliefs are memorized copies of other people’s opinions, you don’t really know why they are right. That means you don’t know IF your professed truths really are true. So how do you maintain your beliefs should events and discoveries contradict them?
Researchers discovered decades ago that people validate their social opinions socially to a certain extent by selecting news outlets, friends, and so on that will tell them they are right. This produces an illusion of consensus, at least among all the “right” people like themselves. Almost everybody does this, but authoritarian followers do it much more because they don’t have many ideas of their own, beliefs they have worked out for themselves and can defend. And they are much more likely to expose themselves only to sources of information that tell them what they want to believe. Getting only one side of a story raises the chances you will get it wrong, but as Ralph Peters, formerly the military analyst at Fox News, said recently, “People that only listen to Fox have an utterly skewed view of reality.”
So there is no sense trying to reason with these people. They are blind sheep.
6 comments:
Baaaaa-ah!
Actually, I agree ... not one of the sheep here. It's too bad that the intertoobs have come along when they did. People used to get information from one of several networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, public TV networks) and they couldn't filter out what they didn't want to see and hear.
Now they can, with an ungodly atrocity like Fox. Pure lies, drivel, and malicious poison--delivered with poison.
So I guess people with an authoritarian compass inside them think outlying behavior is okay. Or, in Shitler's case, out-and-out lying.
PS--Really scary that one of those "people who only listen to Fox" included--by his own admission, and per his preference--the supposedly Catholic antichrist, Antonin Scalia.
Scary.
Scary.
Scary.
Authoritarian followers can be college-educated PhDs, factory workers, musicians ... anybody at all. Since it's not an intellectually- or knowledge-based phenomenon, but rather the result of a kind of "default setting," it cuts across all lines.
Seems it's based on emotional thinking, divorced from reality.
Jonathan Swift: "Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired."
A couple of years ago we had a supreme court election. I asked one of my colleagues why he was voting for the more conservative candidate. He said 'because he is conservative and so am I." When I asked him what that meant, he gave me a blank look. I have never gotten an answer, but I really don't need one. He is a very observant Lutheran; takes off work to attend services on Good Friday.
I was raised Catholic. 12 years of education. I studied the old and new testaments under some very wise and forward-thinking nuns. Those were stories, not "truth", written by (for the most part at least) men. I consider myself an atheist. It used to surprise me how many of my male classmates are pro-trump republicans, but not any more.
Yes Eddie, research has shown that atheists tend to know more about the Bible than devout Christians. If you actually read it, you have a problem with belief. I hope you're reading along with me on Sundays, I find it very interesting.
Yes, I follow you on Sundays as well. Thank you for that. I almost said that I 'enjoy' reading, but sometimes it is just so unpleasant.
Authoritarian followers are not just caused by religious upbringing.
One of my family members is a member of the US military (currently stationed in Kuwait) and a pro-trump republican (last I checked.) Religion was not a part of his upbringing. His father was not particularly religious (until he received a terminal cancer diagnosis), but he was a republican voter for no reason that he could explain. Another of the children said they voted for GHWB because of "no child left behind." (I still don't understand what that was about.) So maybe there is a genetic component.
I never met the grandfather, but I heard he ruled with an iron fist, and a belt.
Wow ... it sounds like authoritarianism begets authoritarianism.
There isn't enough love in the world, and I know the most horrible things I can imagine have happened. Or rather, the vicious cycle has to be broken somehow. My friend in Arkansas, smart as she is in some ways, has voted Republican and especially detested the Clintons for reasons I can't discern. Her father used to do things like destroy a car he owned, or shoot a cow, right in front of her, and beat her till he almost drove her to suicide. And her mother ... absolutely crazy, very mentally ill and undiagnosed.
When I try to tell her what's really going on in our country--you know, facts--she changes the subject. Doesn't want to hear it. Doesn't argue ... just changes the subject and puts up aural blinders.
Post a Comment